Refugees International Expresses Alarm at Proposed Funding Cuts to Foreign Aid

ACT NOW: Help Us Restore Critical Funding for Displaced People
On February 19, the House of Representatives passed a version of the federal budget that drastically reduces lifesaving aid to the world’s most vulnerable people. The House cut Migration and Refugee Assistance by more than 40 percent and International Disaster Assistance by more than 50 percent, even though humanitarian assistance is less than one percent of all U.S. spending. These shocking cuts will limit the provision of basic shelter, food, water, and medicine for the more than 42 million refugees and internally displaced people around the world. Refugees International is calling on the Senate to restore humanitarian funding to at least 2010 levels as they work on the budget this week.

Read our statement on the budget cuts that will affect displaced victims of war, persecution and disasters.
Refugees International Expresses Alarm at Proposed Funding Cuts to Foreign AidWed, 02/16/2011 – 17:03
Slashing Assistance for Victims of Persecution and People Displaced by War Would Be A Devastating Retreat
Statement by Michel Gabaudan, President, Refugees International
Washington, DC — “Refugees International is alarmed by the proposed funding cuts to lifesaving aid for victims of war, persecution and natural disasters proposed by the Republican majority in the House of Representatives on Friday. The Fiscal Year 2011 Continuing Resolution would cut refugee aid through the Migration and Refugee Assistance account by more than 40 percent. It would cut the International Disaster Assistance account by 50 percent. Cutting foreign aid to the world’s most vulnerable people represents a massive retreat of U.S. leadership and influence around the world and would contribute to further instability in volatile countries. Refugees International calls on Republicans and Democrats alike to work together to remedy the shortsighted funding gap, which will only hurt our long-term budget outlook.

“The Republican majority in the House of Representatives has made a disappointing first step in completing the FY2011 budget process. Yet, they are not alone in their failure to engage the American public in an honest dialogue about the U.S. budget deficit. President Obama has proposed funding for the Defense Department in 2012 at $553 billion. In total, funding for Defense operations funneled through various other budgets in FY2010 brought Defense spending to more than 30% of the U.S. budget. By comparison, less than one tenth of one percent of the federal budget goes to programs that help displaced victims of war, persecution and disasters.

“The failure to see many diplomatic and development programs as essential to US national security is a tragic misunderstanding of what national security is and how to best promote it. Indeed, history shows that smart investments in foreign assistance help us avoid future military conflicts, head off threats from beyond our borders and lay the groundwork for future economic growth.

“Until the Obama administration and the Congress get serious about cutting Defense spending and unneeded weapons systems, fixing the tax code and attending to necessary improvements in government programs including entitlements, they will accomplish little in their attempts to fix our fiscal crisis.

“It was the United States that laid claim to the principle that nations are guided by ideals as well as interests. U.S. humanitarian aid dates back to the early 1800’s and over centuries has been supported and strengthened by elected officials who recognized the moral, diplomatic, security and strategic value of humanitarian leadership around the world. Indeed the United States became a beacon of hope for people around the world suffering from repression and poverty, seeking freedom and a better life.

“Humanitarian aid has helped the United States provide a safe haven for victims of Soviet repression, Indochinese who fought alongside the U.S. military, and refugees from Central America, Afghanistan, Iraq and Sudan. Funding to promote peace through such relief aid represents a miniscule fraction of the amount spent on waging war against the Taliban or Al Qaeda. It is a cost effective way of increasing our national security, exemplifying a true respect for human rights, and reflecting the generosity of the American people.”